By: Larry MacDonald
A previous post on bond ETFs elicited requests to explain why it is important to look at the yield to maturity instead of the yield quoted on financial portals like Yahoo Finance. Just why, for example, is it misleading to use Yahoo Finance’s quote of 4% on the iShares Canadian Short-Term Bond ETF (XSB) when iShares.ca’s website quotes the yield to maturity at 2.1%.
The 2.1% yield to maturity is what an “investor holding the underlying bonds within the fund would earn per year if they could hold them until they mature,” said Oliver McMahon, Director of Product Management for iShares Canada.
“Some of the 2.1% annual return is due to the coupon payments, but some is due to the price of the bonds moving towards par.” In other words, the prices of the bonds in the ETF’s portfolio have been bid up past their par values; as time passes and maturity dates are approached, prices edge back down to par. This decline in prices offsets the coupon yield and pushes it toward 2.1%.
The unit price of the ETF will edge down over time due to this factor but it will be hidden in the fluctuations in market rates; “…while we can be reasonably comfortable assuming the underlying portfolio will produce a yield equivalent to 2.1% per annum over the life of the portfolio, it should not be assumed that this will be a constant return over each year. It may be that the return is higher one year and lower the next.”
The stream of interest payments will also edge down said Aubrey Basdeo, Head of Fixed Income, Barclays Global Investors. One can see the decline already in the past three or four quarters of distribution payments. I didn’t quite catch the reason for this and Mr. Basdeo has so far not responded to a request for clarification. My guess is that it may come about from the portfolio rolling over into new bonds at lower interest rates.
Yet another complication: “the portfolio of XSB does not hold bonds until maturity. The product has been created to be representative of the short end of the bond market, which is generally understood to be 1 to 5 years. Thus, as a bond’s life is reduced to less than 1 year it is removed from the index (thus sold from the portfolio) and the proceeds are reinvested across other index holdings. This means that the yield to maturity, while being a useful measure of the return in the market, is not a rate of return the fund can be assured of achieving,” noted Mr. McMahon.
And here, we thought ETFs would simply the construction of portfolios!
Update: Aubrey Basdeo did subsequently confirm that the cause for a decline in the steam of interest payments was the rolling over of the portfolio into new bonds with lower coupon rates. If presently low rates of interest were to rise, this would become less of a factor.
UpdateII: As a reader has noted, it might be useful to explain how Yahoo Finance calculates the 4% yield. Yahoo Finance adds up the XSB distributions over the last 4 quarters and expresses that amount as a percentage of the current price.





5 Responses to “ Use the right yield figure for bond ETFs ”
Hi Larry,
This can be a problem with preferred shares as they approach maturity. The nominal rate might be high with the shares trading above the redemption price. In this case the real return to maturity is lower than the nominal return, but most web sites just report the nominal return.
By Michael James on Oct 14, 2009
MJ
I also noticed a problem with reporting yields on common stocks, for example when there is a special distribution.
By Larry MacDonald on Oct 14, 2009
Although I understand the concept of decreasing yields as bonds roll over to lower coupon rates, nothing was said as to how Yahoo Finance justified their “4% on XSB? Is this guesswork, or are they basing it on some incorrect data?
By Maurice on Oct 14, 2009
Maurice:
Yahoo Finance adds up the XSB distributions over the last 4 quarters and expresses that amount as a percentage of the current price. But distributions are going down as the portfolio rolls into lower coupon bonds while the ETF price edges down (ceritus paribus) from bond prices moving back toward par.
By Larry MacDonald on Oct 14, 2009
Thanks Larry, now I get it!
By Maurice on Oct 14, 2009