By: Tom Watson
I recently participated in one of the Empire Club’s new Lunch ’n Learn sessions, which offered an interactive Q&A session on the need for corporations to adjust media relations and communications strategies to the emerging opportunities and challenges created by social media.
The event was moderated by tweeter Boyd Neil, who is also senior VP and national director of Hill and Knowlton’s corporate communications practice in Canada. He set the tone by asking audience members if their employer was prepared to withstand an attack launched on YouTube or Twitter.
Peter Acteo was on hand to share his reasoning for tweeting as the CEO of ING Direct Canada. You can find them on Twitter. But simply put, he thinks anyone who can talk openly and honestly online as an executive, without plugging products, has an opportunity to better connect with consumers.
Suzanne Fallander, Intel’s manager of corporate responsibility, flew in from the States to explain why her company runs CSR@INtel. The intent is to use social media to create greater transparency through an open dialogue with Intel bloggers, who manage Intel’s CSR strategy in the areas such as environmental sustainability and philanthropy.
My job was to express my opinion on social media as a print journalist. “In all the discussion about the impact of social media on the declining financial health of print and broadcast media, the most interesting question,” according to Boyd, “is whether journalism today is surrendering its role as the watchdog of political and business behaviour to a much broader cadre of watchers, which sometimes includes members of the public who are simply in the right place at the right time.”
“Is this true?” Boyd asked me. My answer, of course, was: “No.”
I wasn’t just offering a self-serving answer. It is a free market. The advertising revenue that supports traditional media is obviously free to (and should) search out the best means possible to attract eyeballs. There will be an adjustment period for news organizations. There will be lost print publications. And the survivors will have to explore the proper mix of paper-based and electronic forms of information delivery. But there will always be a need and demand for traditional journalism.
As I told the Empire Club audience, anyone can run around screaming like the town crier, but they can’t deliver information with the same authority. I do not, in any way, dismiss the power and reach of bloggers. I just do not feel that my profession (trade actually) is threatened by bloggers like Toronto’s Neil Pasricha. He posts about things like loving warm underwear on 1000 Awesome Things, which recently won a coveted Webby Award in the best personal/cultural blog category. He could report news as well, but the coverage would not necessarily be awesome.
I am privileged to work for Canadian Business magazine, which frequently allows me to spend months chasing major feature stories that could not be told, at least not nearly as well, without the resources of a traditional media organization. That includes folks in the art department, not to mention the editors, who help me package my stories and investigative reports. It also includes the researchers and fact checkers and lawyers who help me report complex and controversial tales the right way.
I don’t know exactly how daily news and magazine-style journalism will be delivered a decade from now, but I do know there will always be a market for the kind of unique content that recently helped Canadian Business land a nomination for best magazine of 2008.
In the meantime, corporation must indeed take note that social media has empowered consumers. Last year, I wrote about the Canadian investors who used Facebook to face down Bay Street insiders during the ABCP restructuring. A similar event just took place in the UK, where Busts for Justice, a Facebook campaign launched to support large-breasted women, just forced Marks & Spencer to admit it “boobed” when trying to charge extra for bras with a DD cup or larger.
But be advised, social media also has made journalists of all stripes more powerful than ever before. I just published a massive feature in Canadian Business after an 8-month investigation into UK-based shareholder complaints directed at three Montreal businesses, including the former Canadian franchise partner of socially responsible Ben & Jerry’s. I used the Internet to collect information while joining overseas chat groups to see if other shareholders had similar concerns with these companies. What I found is a fascinating tale of international investor protection woes. To find out more, please check out the current issue of our magazine, which is also jammed with other interesting features and our I500 market data on Canadian companies. And, hey, you really can’t get that combination of informative goodies anywhere else.
_____________________________________
DOUBLE TAKE: Aside from trying to promote myself while generating Web traffic that helps put bread and butter on my table, this blog aims to stir debate by taking a harder look at current news and events. I obviously enjoy voicing my own opinions, but I am a big boy and I welcome all comments that don’t require R ratings. So let me have it via this blog or send me an email at tom.watson@canadianbusiness.rogers.com. I reserve the right to post email comments without disclosing the sender’s name. If you don’t think I am a total twit, follow my DOUBLE TAKE posts via my NotSOCRATES Twitter site at http://twitter.com/NotSocrates. THOMAS WATSON is a Senior Writer and editorial board member at Canadian Business magazine. Since winning a community journalism award as a cub reporter with the Hamilton Spectator in the early ’90s, he has covered business, finance, politics and technology for various news outlets. Prior to joining CB in 2001, he reported on the steel and automotive sectors for the Financial Post. Watson received his first magazine award nomination for exposing a stock manipulation plot aimed at Waterloo, Ont.-based Open Text in 2000, when he was head of investor relations for an international venture capital outfit in the City of London. Watson holds graduate degrees in journalism, international relations and public finance and undergraduate degrees in history and politics.





5 Responses to “ Twitter vs. Traditional Media ”
After witnessing #amazonfail on Twitter, I couldn’t possibly agree with you more. For all the blog posts that were written on the subject, not one mentioned that the algorithm misadventure happened a mere two days before the company was due to present its annual earnings – something no seasoned business journalist would ever have missed. The one voice of reason I could find was, in fact, BusinessWeek’s Heather L. Green, who had written an article about how media-averse Amazon is generally just a few days before #amazonfail hit the Tweetosphere.
However, Boyd’s points are valid too. And I say that not just because I used to work for him.
By Ruth Seeley on May 11, 2009
The social media sphere is one of those areas where companies need to do some long and hard thinking before they (hopefully proactively, and not as a reaction to negative press) engage.
The authoritative status of bloggers etc from large companies can be a powerful factor in moving their audience. For instance, I may know more about a specific topic than some exec from a technology company, but their position gives them a great platform that they can leverage. If they don’t know how to talk to the specific audience on their target site though, they may also cause significant damage to their brands.
Moral of the story: companies need to hire experts who “get” social media, and then they need to actually listen to the advice given.
By Jeremy Lichtman on May 12, 2009