<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canadian Business Blogs &#124; Advice on Investment in Canada, Stock Market, Small Businesses Opportunities &#187; Ted Rogers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/tag/ted-rogers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:07:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ted Rogers, 1933-2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/ted-rogers-1933-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/ted-rogers-1933-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Wahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Wahl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richest Canadians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogers Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Rogers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you missed it on the homepage, here is a story I wrote Tuesday on the death of Ted Rogers, and what it might mean for the company he founded, Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI.b). (RCI owns Canadian Business, and this website.) I also wrote about him for last year&#8217;s Rich 100 list of wealthiest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it on the homepage, here is a <a title="The passing of a visionary" href="http://www.canadianbusiness.com/technology/companies/article.jsp?content=20081202_162313_7772">story</a> I wrote Tuesday on the death of Ted Rogers, and what it might mean for the company he founded, Rogers Communications Inc. (<a title="RCI.b" href="http://www.canadianbusiness.com/markets/stock_lookup.jsp?ticker=T.RCI.b">RCI.b</a>). (RCI owns <em>Canadian Business</em>, and this website.) I also <a title="Edward(Ted)Rogers Jr." href="http://www.canadianbusiness.com/after_hours/article.jsp?content=20071131_198708_198708">wrote about him</a> for last year&#8217;s Rich 100 list of wealthiest Canadians, because he&#8217;d rocketed up to the No. 2 spot. Unfortunately, this year&#8217;s <a title="Canadian Business magazine current issue" href="http://www.canadianbusiness.com/canadian_business_magazine/index.jsp">Rich 100 issue</a> was actually printed the same day as he died, and too late to pull back, so he still <a title="Rich 100 ranking" href="http://list.canadianbusiness.com/rankings/rich100/2008/displayProfile.aspx?profile=4">appears as No. 4</a>. A proper tribute to him will appear in our next issue, out on Dec. 18.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/ted-rogers-1933-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Rogers will be missed</title>
		<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/ted-rogers-will-be-missed/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/ted-rogers-will-be-missed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Larry MacDonald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Larry MacDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogers Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Rogers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never met Ted Rogers. But I think I would have liked him if I had. We both thought alike when it came to hard work, entrepreneurialism, and persistence.

Still, the prospect of meeting him would have filled me with trepidation. It wouldn’t be because of his stature in the world of Canadian business. It would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never met <a href="http://www.canadianbusiness.com/markets/headline_news/article.jsp?content=b120225A">Ted Rogers</a>. But I think I would have liked him if I had. We both thought alike when it came to hard work, entrepreneurialism, and persistence.</p>
<p><span id="more-444"></span></p>
<p>Still, the prospect of meeting him would have filled me with trepidation. It wouldn’t be because of his stature in the world of Canadian business. It would be for fear I would hear: “Hey, aren’t you the guy who trashed my company?”</p>
<p>Yes, that’s right. Many years before I began working for Canadian Business Online (owned by Rogers Communications), I wrote an article in Investor’s Digest of Canada advising investors to avoid shares in Rogers Communications. In fact, I said sell them. The debt load was too high.</p>
<p>Sometime after, a lengthy letter arrived from Rogers Communication’s chief financial officer. It strongly disagreed with the analysis and some facts. There might have even been a reference to “consulting with our lawyers,” or something like that. The editors dodged the bullet by running an apology, headlined: MACDONALD WAS WRONG. Well, at least they kept me on.</p>
<p>A month or so after sending the anguished letter, the CFO left Rogers’ Communications. Had my diatribe been the straw that broke the back of a fed-up camel? I’ll never know.</p>
<p>Then, over the next year or so, shares in the cable company tumbled all the way to $3.00. My bearish call, as riddled with as it was with dodgy analysis and figures, proved to be the right one. It’s better to be lucky than good, as they say.</p>
<p>Now, <a href="http://www.canadianbusiness.com/stock_lookup.jsp?ticker=t.rci.b">Rogers Communications</a> has emerged as a growth company. After years of losses, it is reporting profits, and began paying a dividend that now yields nearly 3%. The shares reached a high of $50 in 2007 and are holding up relatively well, close to $35, as 2008 comes to a close.</p>
<p>The company appears to be winning the convergence battle in the telecommunications field. Ted Rogers certainly has to be given credit for what he built. Many thought he was being too reckless with borrowing and too aggressive in making acquisitions. But he prevailed and showed he had the right approach. It looks like his company will be around for a very long time now. Canadian business could use more Ted Rogers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/ted-rogers-will-be-missed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
