<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canadian Business Blogs &#124; Advice on Investment in Canada, Stock Market, Small Businesses Opportunities &#187; acocunting fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/tag/acocunting-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Drabinsky Final Argument &#8211; 13: Drabinsky&#8217;s &#8220;Mistress&#8221; Redux</title>
		<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/drabinsky-final-argument-13-drabinskys-mistress-redux/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/drabinsky-final-argument-13-drabinskys-mistress-redux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Gray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acocunting fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drabinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eckstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Poppell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Livent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Very few opportunities were missed by Eckstein at trial to take personal shots at Drabinsky, including characterizing Drabinsky&#8217;s friend, Karen Poppell as his &#8220;mistress&#8221; even though Drabinsky was separated from his wife.&#8221;

Has the defence been paying attention to the prosecution&#8217;s case? Maybe not, in it&#8217;s final submission, the Crown included a 10-page handwritten letter from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Very few opportunities were missed by Eckstein at trial to take personal shots at Drabinsky, including characterizing Drabinsky&#8217;s friend, Karen Poppell as his &#8220;mistress&#8221; even though Drabinsky was separated from his wife.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-492"></span></p>
<p>Has the defence been paying attention to the prosecution&#8217;s case? Maybe not, in it&#8217;s final submission, the Crown included a 10-page handwritten letter from Drabinsky to Poppell that indicated she was much more than a &#8220;friend.&#8221; If the contents of the letter are to be believed, Poppell was indeed in a deep and extramarital relationship with Drabinsky prior to him leaving his wife. According to the letter, the fact that Drabinsky had not left his wife was a source of much friction in their relationship. That, and the fact that Poppell refused to read Drabinsky&#8217;s book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/drabinsky-final-argument-13-drabinskys-mistress-redux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drabinsky Final Argument &#8211; 10: Messina 2.95 million reasons to lie?</title>
		<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/drabinsky-final-argument-10-messina-295-million-reasons-to-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/drabinsky-final-argument-10-messina-295-million-reasons-to-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Gray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acocunting fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Livent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/?p=487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that Messina and Eckstein have pled guilty to criminal charges in the US (Eckstein has also pled guilty to charges in Canada) show that their testimony cannot be trusted, the defence argues. After all, those plea bargains give them every incentive to lie and continue their frame up of Drabinsky and Gottlieb.

&#8220;Eckstein and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that Messina and Eckstein have pled guilty to criminal charges in the US (Eckstein has also pled guilty to charges in Canada) show that their testimony cannot be trusted, the defence argues. After all, those plea bargains give them every incentive to lie and continue their frame up of Drabinsky and Gottlieb.</p>
<p><span id="more-487"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Eckstein and Messina have not been sentenced,&#8221; the defence argues. If they provide &#8217;substantial assistance&#8217; in the prosection (ie, lie) they will not face any jail time for their crimes.</p>
<p>Messina has even more reasons to lie &#8211; $2.95 million reasons. That&#8217;s the amount of money she has been paid over the past decade working for Livent, the receiver handling the Livent bankruptcy as well as Stikeman Elliot, the lawfirm currently working on a $100 million civil suit againt Drabinsky and Gottlieb and a $450 million lawsuit against Deloitte and Touche &#8211; Livent&#8217;s old auditors and the firm Messina used to work for prior to joining Livent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/drabinsky-final-argument-10-messina-295-million-reasons-to-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
