<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protectionism, credit and another bailout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/protectionism-credit-and-another-bailout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/protectionism-credit-and-another-bailout/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:52:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/protectionism-credit-and-another-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-6093</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/?p=562#comment-6093</guid>
		<description>While in principle I am not concerned about the government purchase of mortgages from Cdn banks to the tune of $75 billion, those mortgages being insured by CMHC in any event, so we are on the hook for them.  What I am concerned about is the lack of oversight about the whole process.
Who is insuring that we buy ONLY CANADIAN mortgages, and are not helping bail the banks out for US mortgages that are NOT guaranteed by CMHC?  Who is ensuring that the CDO/CMO&#039;s being purchased are in fact ONLY mortgages, and not credit card debt, car loans, etc.  After all, even Alan Greenspan says some of these SIV&#039;s are so complex even he can&#039;t understand them.

And what about the spending on purchases, takeovers, mergers being performed by Canadian banks.  Are they really in need of this &quot;removal of toxic assets&quot; from their books.

It seems interesting that they on the one hand want them removed, yet TD Bank in it&#039;s recent results, consider&#039;s the decrease in value of $2.5 in their CMO portfolio to be &quot;temporary&quot;.  If this is so, then I guess there is no need for the taxpayer to take them off their hands.

I think the politicians are being boondoggled by the bankers into giving them cash they really don&#039;t need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While in principle I am not concerned about the government purchase of mortgages from Cdn banks to the tune of $75 billion, those mortgages being insured by CMHC in any event, so we are on the hook for them.  What I am concerned about is the lack of oversight about the whole process.<br />
Who is insuring that we buy ONLY CANADIAN mortgages, and are not helping bail the banks out for US mortgages that are NOT guaranteed by CMHC?  Who is ensuring that the CDO/CMO&#8217;s being purchased are in fact ONLY mortgages, and not credit card debt, car loans, etc.  After all, even Alan Greenspan says some of these SIV&#8217;s are so complex even he can&#8217;t understand them.</p>
<p>And what about the spending on purchases, takeovers, mergers being performed by Canadian banks.  Are they really in need of this &#8220;removal of toxic assets&#8221; from their books.</p>
<p>It seems interesting that they on the one hand want them removed, yet TD Bank in it&#8217;s recent results, consider&#8217;s the decrease in value of $2.5 in their CMO portfolio to be &#8220;temporary&#8221;.  If this is so, then I guess there is no need for the taxpayer to take them off their hands.</p>
<p>I think the politicians are being boondoggled by the bankers into giving them cash they really don&#8217;t need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Meharg</title>
		<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/protectionism-credit-and-another-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-4229</link>
		<dc:creator>John Meharg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/?p=562#comment-4229</guid>
		<description>Americans and their protectionism!!!

It’s a lucky thing for Americans that our Canadian politicians are so meek and feeble. Or as they would see it, diplomatic and neighborly.

Canada is one of the very few countries in the world that has the resources and ability for sustained protectionist international policy. 

When Americans enforce economic protectionism, our government should step in and support our industry sectors with mass purchasing and stockpiling under an economic security clause. It’s not like the rest of the world does not need or want Canadian goods and services. Subsidies are not a foreign concept to us after all. 

We should equally apply the same rules of the game to the USA by raising the costs of our energy and commodity exports. Gone should be the days of trusted and good faith long-term contracts with the USA. 

The USA is so completely dependant on international imports, and it could never sustain its position as economic “Bully” if the other kids in the political schoolyard stood up for justice and equallity.

This is just another sting to Canadians who are so completely loyal and generous to Americans, and it’s always a sad day when you find out just how selfish your best friend really is. 

Americans have walked all over NAFTA free trade agreements, making a joke of international industry law. 

Americans these days seem like the type to brag about winning a race in which the whole world watched them cheat. 

And Canadians sometimes the races looser, recognizing the signs of psychotic delusion, and narcissism with a propensity for extreme violence. 

Says, yup you’re the winner neighbor, your number 1. But winning is not everything, sometimes it’s how you play the game that counts most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans and their protectionism!!!</p>
<p>It’s a lucky thing for Americans that our Canadian politicians are so meek and feeble. Or as they would see it, diplomatic and neighborly.</p>
<p>Canada is one of the very few countries in the world that has the resources and ability for sustained protectionist international policy. </p>
<p>When Americans enforce economic protectionism, our government should step in and support our industry sectors with mass purchasing and stockpiling under an economic security clause. It’s not like the rest of the world does not need or want Canadian goods and services. Subsidies are not a foreign concept to us after all. </p>
<p>We should equally apply the same rules of the game to the USA by raising the costs of our energy and commodity exports. Gone should be the days of trusted and good faith long-term contracts with the USA. </p>
<p>The USA is so completely dependant on international imports, and it could never sustain its position as economic “Bully” if the other kids in the political schoolyard stood up for justice and equallity.</p>
<p>This is just another sting to Canadians who are so completely loyal and generous to Americans, and it’s always a sad day when you find out just how selfish your best friend really is. </p>
<p>Americans have walked all over NAFTA free trade agreements, making a joke of international industry law. </p>
<p>Americans these days seem like the type to brag about winning a race in which the whole world watched them cheat. </p>
<p>And Canadians sometimes the races looser, recognizing the signs of psychotic delusion, and narcissism with a propensity for extreme violence. </p>
<p>Says, yup you’re the winner neighbor, your number 1. But winning is not everything, sometimes it’s how you play the game that counts most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
