<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crumbling stock markets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/crumbling-stock-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/crumbling-stock-markets/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:18:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/crumbling-stock-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-5736</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/?p=614#comment-5736</guid>
		<description>CI
And if one uses a risk-free rate of 3%, it can take over 15 years to get back to breakeven. But rebalancing (toward equities) can lessen the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CI<br />
And if one uses a risk-free rate of 3%, it can take over 15 years to get back to breakeven. But rebalancing (toward equities) can lessen the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CanadianInvestor</title>
		<link>http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/crumbling-stock-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-5733</link>
		<dc:creator>CanadianInvestor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/?p=614#comment-5733</guid>
		<description>This time boomers won&#039;t forget it, because they will be working four or five more years than they anticipated. (It&#039;s not just boomer investors, it&#039;s those who depend on pension plans too.) If the bottom is 50% loss, then it takes a 100% gain to get back to square one. At 15% per annum, rule of 72 says 4.8 years to double. But, thanks for the encouragement, it&#039;s better to think of recovery then a slide to oblivion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time boomers won&#8217;t forget it, because they will be working four or five more years than they anticipated. (It&#8217;s not just boomer investors, it&#8217;s those who depend on pension plans too.) If the bottom is 50% loss, then it takes a 100% gain to get back to square one. At 15% per annum, rule of 72 says 4.8 years to double. But, thanks for the encouragement, it&#8217;s better to think of recovery then a slide to oblivion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
